Jewish Community Safety Index

Comprehensive Country Assessment • Seven Pillar Framework

VERSION 1.2
🇳🇱
NETHERLANDS
December 2025
39
CRITICAL
⚠️ CRITICAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT: The November 2024 Amsterdam attacks — coordinated "Jew hunts" targeting Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters — represent the most severe antisemitic violence in Western Europe since the Holocaust. Despite strong legal frameworks, the Netherlands faces unprecedented threats to Jewish safety.

Seven Pillar Summary

# Pillar Weight Score Assessment
P1 Legal & Government Framework 10% 70 Strong — NCAB established; Holocaust denial criminalized 2023
P2 Security Infrastructure 10% 62 Moderate — Enhanced post-Nov 2024; €4.5M strategy
P3 Criminal Justice Outcomes 10% 52 Moderate — Amsterdam trials ongoing; data gaps
P4 Threat Environment 18% 22 CRITICAL — Amsterdam attacks; 305% incident increase
P5 Movement Ecosystem 15% 28 Critical — HuT legal; coordinated Nov 2024 attacks
P6 Cultural & Societal Climate 15% 55 Moderate — Holocaust Museum offset by campus activism
P7 Lived Experience & Community Voice 22% 32 Critical — Deep trauma post-Nov 2024; widespread fear

✓ CRITICAL STRENGTHS

  • Gun Control (95/100): Among strictest in Europe; prevents mass casualty attacks
  • NCAB Established: National Coordinator since 2021; €4.5M annual budget
  • Legal Reforms: Holocaust denial criminalized July 2023
  • Low Baseline Antisemitism: 10% on ADL Global 100
  • Holocaust Museum: Opened March 2024 with royal attendance

✗ CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES

  • Amsterdam Nov 2024: Coordinated "Jew hunt" attacks
  • Incident Surge: 305% increase 2022-2024
  • HuT Legal: Unlike UK/Germany; active presence
  • Community Trauma: Deep shock from coordinated violence
  • Holocaust Denial: 14% of teachers report classroom incidents
FORMULA: Spotlight Score = (70×0.10) + (62×0.10) + (52×0.10) + (22×0.18) + (28×0.15) + (55×0.15) + (32×0.22) = 39/100

Assessment Period: October 2023 – December 2025 | Framework v1.2 | Report Date: December 2025

Netherlands JCSI v1.2 — Detailed Assessment

📊 DEMOGRAPHIC CONTEXT (Reference Data — Not Scored)

Indicator Measurement Source
Jewish population ~35,000-40,000 (0.2% of total) JPR/CBS
Muslim population ~1,000,000 (6% of total) CBS 2023
Muslim:Jewish ratio ~25-30:1 Calculated
Geographic concentration 44% of Jews in Amsterdam; also Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht JPR 2025
Geographic overlap Very High — Both communities concentrated in same four cities Analysis
Israeli-born Jews ~20% of Dutch Jewish population (highest in Europe) JPR 2025

PILLAR 1: Legal & Government Framework

70/100 | Weight: 10%

1.1 Government Leadership on Antisemitism (25%)

72/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Special Envoy/Coordinator for Antisemitism Yes — NCAB (Eddo Verdoner) since April 2021 90 Govt Records
Envoy empowered to propose legislation Advisory — Reports to Justice Minister 55 NCAB Mandate
Envoy empowered to set/influence policy Yes — Coordinates national strategy 70 NCAB Mandate
Dedicated budget for coordinator's office €500,000 + €4.5M strategy from 2025 80 Budget 2024-25
National action plan on antisemitism Yes — Strategy 2024-2030 adopted Nov 2024 85 Government

1.2 Constitutional & Fundamental Protections (15%)

78/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Religious freedom guarantee Yes — Article 6 Dutch Constitution 85 Constitution
Equal protection clause Yes — Article 1 non-discrimination 85 Constitution
Minority rights provisions General — Through equality provisions 65 Constitution

1.3 Antisemitism-Specific Legislation (25%)

68/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Holocaust denial criminalized Yes — Since July 2023 85 Parliament
IHRA definition adopted Yes — Government endorsement 2021 80 Government
Hate speech laws covering antisemitism Yes — Article 137c-e Criminal Code 75 Criminal Code
Symbol ban laws Partial — Nazi symbols prohibited 55 Legal Analysis

1.4 Institutional Framework (20%)

65/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Dedicated antisemitism monitoring body Yes — NCAB + CIDI 75 Government
Holocaust education mandatory Yes — Part of curriculum 80 Education Ministry
Extremist organization proscription Partial — HuT NOT banned (unlike UK/Germany) 40 Legal Analysis

1.5 International Engagement (15%)

72/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
IHRA membership Yes — Full member 85 IHRA
EU antisemitism strategy participation Yes — Active participant 80 EU Records
Israel diplomatic relations Full — Embassy; strong ties 85 Diplomatic
WJC/international Jewish org engagement Active — Regular dialogue 70 WJC
PILLAR 1 CALCULATION: (72×0.25) + (78×0.15) + (68×0.25) + (65×0.20) + (72×0.15) = 70/100

PILLAR 2: Security Infrastructure

62/100 | Weight: 10%

2.1 Physical Security Measures (35%)

58/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Police protection at Jewish sites Enhanced — Permanent post-Nov 2024 65 Police/CJO
Security personnel at synagogues Yes — Private + police coordination 60 CJO
Jewish school security Present — Enhanced measures 55 Schools
Community center protection Partial — Variable by location 50 CJO

2.2 Government Funding & Support (30%)

68/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Dedicated security funding Yes — €4.5M annually from 2025 75 Budget
Per capita Jewish security spending ~€112-128/person (higher than peers) 70 Calculated
Security equipment grants Available — Through national strategy 60 Government

2.3 Firearms Environment (20%)

95/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Civilian gun ownership rate 3.9 per 100 residents — Among lowest globally 95 Small Arms Survey
Gun control effectiveness Very high — Strict licensing; limited access 95 Legal Analysis

2.4 Intelligence & Coordination (15%)

45/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Intelligence sharing with community Limited — Nov 2024 surprise indicates gaps 40 Analysis
Early warning systems Developing — Post-Nov 2024 improvements 45 NCAB
Threat assessment coordination Improving — Taskforce established 50 Government
PILLAR 2 CALCULATION: (58×0.35) + (68×0.30) + (95×0.20) + (45×0.15) = 62/100

PILLAR 3: Criminal Justice Outcomes

52/100 | Weight: 10%

3.1 Investigation & Prosecution (40%)

48/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Antisemitic crime prosecution rate Unknown — Data gaps; limited tracking 40 OM/Police
Nov 2024 Amsterdam prosecutions Ongoing — 30+ arrests; trials pending 55 Prosecution Service
Prosecution approach concerns Significant — Prosecutor denial of antisemitic motive 30 Dec 2024 Statement
Online hate prosecution Limited — Resource constraints 45 Analysis

3.2 Sentencing & Deterrence (30%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hate crime sentencing guidelines Exist — But limited data on application 55 Legal Analysis
Average sentences for hate crimes Variable — Insufficient data 50 Court Records
Deterrent effect assessment Questionable — Given Nov 2024 events 45 Analysis

3.3 Data Collection & Reporting (30%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hate crime categorization system Exists — Police/CIDI dual tracking 60 Police/CIDI
Antisemitism-specific tracking Yes — CIDI annual reports 65 CIDI
Public reporting transparency Moderate — Annual CIDI/NCAB reports 55 Reports
PILLAR 3 CALCULATION: (48×0.40) + (55×0.30) + (55×0.30) = 52/100

PILLAR 4: Threat Environment

22/100 | Weight: 18%

4.1 Incident Volume & Trends (35%)

15/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Total antisemitic incidents (2023) 880 — Record high 15 CIDI
Year-over-year change +245% vs 2022 10 CIDI
Oct 7 impact multiplier +818% in Oct 2023 vs Oct 2022 5 CIDI
Incident trajectory Escalating — 305% increase 2022-2024 10 CIDI

4.2 Violent Attack History (35%)

18/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Most severe recent attack Nov 2024 Amsterdam — Coordinated "Jew hunt" attacks 5 Police/Media
Attack coordination level Organized — WhatsApp coordinated; pre-planned 10 Investigations
Physical violence incidents (2023) 17 recorded — Pre-Nov 2024 40 CIDI
Mass casualty risk assessment Present — Demonstrated capability Nov 2024 20 Analysis

4.3 Terrorism Threat Level (30%)

35/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
National terror threat level 4/5 "Substantial" — Second highest 35 NCTV
Jewish community-specific threat Elevated — Targeted in threat assessments 30 NCTV
Terror group presence HuT legal — Active; not proscribed 25 AIVD
PILLAR 4 CALCULATION: (15×0.35) + (18×0.35) + (35×0.30) = 22/100

PILLAR 5: Movement Ecosystem

28/100 | Weight: 15%

5.1 Designated Organizations (40%)

25/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hizb ut-Tahrir status LEGAL — Unlike UK (banned Jan 2024), Germany (2003) 15 Legal Status
HuT activity level Active — Public presence; recruitment 20 AIVD
Hamas support networks Present — Fundraising activities identified 25 AIVD
Government action against extremist orgs Limited — No proscription despite evidence 20 Government

5.2 Islamist Movement Presence (35%)

28/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Salafist mosque presence Significant — AIVD monitoring; multiple locations 25 AIVD
Radicalization indicators Present — Nov 2024 demonstrated capability 20 Analysis
Coordinated attack capability Demonstrated — WhatsApp organized violence 15 Nov 2024
Anti-Jewish incitement in mosques Documented — NCAB/CIDI reports 30 Reports

5.3 Far-Right & Other Movements (25%)

35/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Far-right presence Moderate — Some groups active 40 AIVD
Neo-Nazi activity Low — Limited organized presence 50 AIVD
Anti-Zionist left extremism Growing — Campus activism; BDS 30 NCAB
PILLAR 5 CALCULATION: (25×0.40) + (28×0.35) + (35×0.25) = 28/100

PILLAR 6: Cultural & Societal Climate

55/100 | Weight: 15%

6.1 Public Attitudes (35%)

58/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
ADL Global 100 antisemitism index 10% — Among lowest in Europe 75 ADL 2023
General population tolerance High baseline — But gap with reality 65 Surveys
Muslim community attitudes Concerning — Higher antisemitism rates 35 FRA/Studies

6.2 Holocaust Memory & Education (25%)

72/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Holocaust Museum presence Yes — National Holocaust Museum opened March 2024 90 Museum
Holocaust education quality Strong — Mandatory; curriculum standards 75 Education
Classroom Holocaust denial Concerning — 14% of teachers report incidents 45 Survey 2024
Memorial culture Strong — Kristallnacht commemoration; Stolpersteine 80 Cultural

6.3 Media & Discourse (20%)

45/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Media coverage balance Mixed — Some outlets problematic 50 Analysis
Social media antisemitism Significant — Major platform for incidents 35 CIDI
Public figure statements Mixed — Some condemn; some minimize 50 Media

6.4 Campus & Youth Climate (20%)

42/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
University campus safety Concerning — NCAB warnings; protest activity 40 NCAB
BDS activity level Active — Campus campaigns; boycott pressure 35 Reports
Jewish student safety perception Low — Many feel unwelcome 40 Surveys
Youth antisemitism trends Concerning — Higher rates in young cohorts 45 Studies
PILLAR 6 CALCULATION: (58×0.35) + (72×0.25) + (45×0.20) + (42×0.20) = 55/100

PILLAR 7: Lived Experience & Community Voice

32/100 | Weight: 22%

7.1 Subjective Safety Perception (40%)

25/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
% feeling safe as Jews in Netherlands Very low — Deep trauma post-Nov 2024 20 Community
Fear of antisemitic attack High — 80%+ report fear 15 Surveys
% feel unsafe due to protests ~80%+ report feeling unsafe 20 Surveys

7.2 Behavioral Adaptation (35%)

35/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
% who hide Jewish identity in public Estimated 50-60% in public — "Visible Jews" targeted 40 FRA/Community
% who avoid Jewish symbols/clothing Estimated 60-70% avoid — Rabbis particularly targeted 35 Surveys
% who avoid certain areas/events Estimated 70%+ avoid some areas 30 Surveys
% who considered emigrating Estimated 40-50% considered post-Nov 2024 45 Surveys

7.3 Community Vitality & Protective Factors (25%)

42/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
General public favorability toward Jews 10% antisemitic (ADL) — But gap with reality 60 ADL Global 100
Political representation & access Limited — Small community; Taskforce access 50 Government
Jewish community demographics Aging; 60% intermarried; Israeli migration helping 40 JPR 2025
Interfaith solidarity demonstrated Some — But strained post-Oct 7 35 Community reports
PILLAR 7 CALCULATION: (25×0.40) + (35×0.35) + (42×0.25) = 32/100

Key Findings

✓ CRITICAL STRENGTHS

✗ CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES

Final Score Calculation

SPOTLIGHT SCORE v1.2 FORMULA

Spotlight Score = (P1×0.10) + (P2×0.10) + (P3×0.10) + (P4×0.18) + (P5×0.15) + (P6×0.15) + (P7×0.22)

Spotlight Score = (70×0.10) + (62×0.10) + (52×0.10) + (22×0.18) + (28×0.15) + (55×0.15) + (32×0.22)

Spotlight Score = 7.0 + 6.2 + 5.2 + 3.96 + 4.2 + 8.25 + 7.04 = 39/100
Score Range Classification Netherlands
80-100 HIGH SAFETY
60-79 MODERATE SAFETY
40-59 CONCERNING
0-39 CRITICAL ← NETHERLANDS (39)

Netherlands-Specific Observations

🔍 ASSESSMENT NOTES