Jewish Community Safety Index

Comprehensive Country Assessment β€’ Seven Pillar Framework

VERSION 1.2
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
UNITED STATES
39
CRITICAL
⚠️ CRITICAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT: The USA faces an unprecedented multi-vector threat environment: 9,354 antisemitic incidents in 2024 (record high, +893% over 10 years), multiple fatal attacks in 2025 (Capital Jewish Museum: 2 killed; Boulder: 1 killed, 15 injured), and systemic gun accessibility via Second Amendment that fundamentally distinguishes US risk profile from peer nations.

Seven Pillar Summary

# Pillar Weight Score Assessment
P1 Legal & Government Framework 10% 52 Moderate – Strong civil rights; 2A limits gun control
P2 Security Infrastructure 10% 74 Strong – SCN network; $454M+ federal funding
P3 Criminal Justice Outcomes 10% 55 Moderate – DOJ Task Force; significant data gaps
P4 Threat Environment 18% 12 CRITICAL – Record incidents; multiple 2025 attacks; gun access
P5 Movement Ecosystem NEW 15% 32 Concerning – SJP active; HuT legal; mass protests
P6 Cultural & Societal Climate NEW 15% 55 Moderate – BDS activity offset by heritage recognition
P7 Lived Experience & Community Voice 22% 32 Critical – 55% experienced antisemitism; 34% hiding identity

βœ“ CRITICAL STRENGTHS

  • Largest diaspora: 7.5-7.7M Jews with robust institutions
  • Security Investment: $454.5M FY2024 NSGP; record funding
  • SCN Network: National Jewish Security Operations Command
  • Strong civil rights: 1st & 14th Amendment protections
  • Terror bans: Hamas/Hezbollah FTO since 1997
  • DOJ Task Force: Antisemitism task force Feb 2025
  • Political representation: Strong Cabinet, Congress presence

βœ— CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES

  • Constitutional gun access: 2nd Amendment; 393M+ firearms
  • Multiple 2025 attacks: DC (2 killed); Boulder (1 killed, 15 injured)
  • Record incidents: 9,354 in 2024 (+893% over 10 years)
  • Campus crisis: 1,694 incidents (+84%); encampments
  • No Holocaust denial ban: 1st Amendment protects
  • Multi-vector threats: ISIS, white supremacist, pro-Hamas
  • Community distress: 55% experienced antisemitism
JCSI v1.2 FORMULA: (P1Γ—0.10) + (P2Γ—0.10) + (P3Γ—0.10) + (P4Γ—0.18) + (P5Γ—0.15) + (P6Γ—0.15) + (P7Γ—0.22) = 39/100 CRITICAL

PILLAR 1: Legal & Government Framework (10%)

52/100

1.1 Hate Crime & Discrimination Laws (25%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
National hate crime legislation exists 18 U.S.C. Β§ 249 (Shepard-Byrd Act); covers religion 80 Federal Law
Antisemitism legally defined IHRA adopted by executive order (varies by admin) 55 Executive Order
Holocaust denial criminalized Not criminalized – 1st Amendment protection 0 Constitutional
Sentence enhancement for hate crimes Federal & most state laws; variable application 70 State/Federal
Protection for religious sites Church Arson Prevention Act; RFRA framework 75 Federal Law

1.2 Government Structure & Responsiveness (40%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
National antisemitism coordinator/envoy Antisemitism Envoy (Lipstadt 2022-25; position renewal TBD) 60 State Dept
Official action plan against antisemitism National Strategy (May 2023); 100+ commitments 70 White House
Parliamentary/legislative committee House Task Force; Senate attention varies 55 Congress
Regular government reporting FBI HCSA annual; State TIP; data gaps 50 FBI/DOJ
Official liaison with Jewish community White House Jewish Liaison; Cabinet access 75 White House

1.3 Gun Control & Weapons Regulation (20%)

12/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Gun accessibility restrictions 2nd Amendment right; 393M+ civilian firearms 5 Constitutional
Assault weapons regulation No federal ban (expired 2004); state varies 15 Federal/State
Background check effectiveness NICS; private sale loophole in many states 25 ATF
Red flag law coverage 21 states + DC; 29 states lack ERPOs 30 State Laws

⚑ US-SPECIFIC: Gun Control Differential

The USA's constitutional gun accessibility fundamentally distinguishes its threat profile from all peer nations. While UK, Australia, France, and Germany score 90-100 on gun control, the USA's score of 12/100 creates a systemic vulnerability enabling mass casualty attacks (Pittsburgh 2018: 11 killed; Poway 2019: 1 killed; Boulder 2025: 1 killed, 15 injured).

1.4 International Obligations & Terror Designations (15%)

70/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hamas designated as terrorist org FTO since 1997; asset freezes active 100 State Dept
Hezbollah fully designated Full designation since 1997 100 State Dept
Hizb ut-Tahrir designated Legal status; 1st Amendment protection 0 Constitutional
IRGC designated FTO since 2019 100 State Dept
PILLAR 1 CALCULATION: (55Γ—0.25) + (55Γ—0.40) + (12Γ—0.20) + (70Γ—0.15) = 52/100

PILLAR 2: Security Infrastructure (10%)

74/100

2.1 Physical Security Resources (40%)

82/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Dedicated security funding (per capita) $454.5M NSGP FY2024 + state supplements (CA $160M, NY $109M) 90 DHS/FEMA
Police presence at sites Varies by jurisdiction; major metro High Holidays deployment 70 Local PD
Physical hardening support NSGP covers guards, barriers, cameras, access control 85 DHS
Armed protection availability Extensive private security; SCN coordination 80 SCN

2.2 Jewish Community Security Organization (35%)

80/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
National security organization exists SCN (Secure Community Network) since 2004 100 SCN
Real-time threat intelligence NJSOC – only faith-based entity with direct FBI/NTOC link 95 SCN/FBI
Professional staff & resources 75+ employees; regional directors nationwide 85 SCN
Training programs offered 6,000+ trainings/year; active shooter; threat recognition 90 SCN
Community coverage 146 Federations; varying local capacity 65 JFNA

2.3 Government-Community Coordination (25%)

60/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Joint threat assessment mechanism FBI-SCN partnership; Fusion Center access varies 70 FBI/DHS
Incident reporting system ADL H.E.A.T. Map; FBI reporting fragmented 55 ADL/FBI
Emergency response protocols Established but variable by jurisdiction 60 Local/Federal
PILLAR 2 CALCULATION: (82Γ—0.40) + (80Γ—0.35) + (60Γ—0.25) = 74/100

PILLAR 3: Criminal Justice Outcomes (10%)

55/100

3.1 Investigation & Prosecution (40%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hate crime prosecution rate Limited federal prosecutions; DOJ Task Force Feb 2025 50 DOJ
Specialized hate crime units FBI Civil Rights; major cities have units 60 FBI/Local
Clearance rate for antisemitic crimes Limited data; varies widely by jurisdiction 45 FBI UCR
Quality of evidence collection Variable; training gaps in some jurisdictions 55 DOJ

3.2 Data Collection & Reporting (35%)

52/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Mandatory hate crime reporting Voluntary until 2022 (Jabara-Heyer Act); gaps remain 50 FBI/DOJ
Data disaggregation (religion) FBI HCSA tracks Jewish-targeted; 1,832 (2023) 60 FBI HCSA
Agency participation rate ~15,000 agencies; significant non-participation 45 FBI
Timeliness of data publication 12-18 month lag on FBI data 40 FBI

3.3 Judicial Response & Sentencing (25%)

58/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Appropriate sentencing patterns Bowers: 63 life terms + death; variable otherwise 60 Court Records
Hate crime enhancements applied Available; application varies by state/judge 55 State Courts
Victim support in proceedings Federal CVRA; state victim assistance varies 55 DOJ/States
PILLAR 3 CALCULATION: (55Γ—0.40) + (52Γ—0.35) + (58Γ—0.25) = 55/100

PILLAR 4: Threat Environment (18%)

12/100
🚨 CRITICAL: The USA faces an unprecedented multi-vector threat environment with record antisemitic incidents, multiple fatal attacks in 2025, and systemic gun accessibility that fundamentally distinguishes US risk from peer nations.

4.1 Physical Violence & Attacks (40%)

8/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Mass casualty attacks (5 years) Pittsburgh 2018 (11); Poway 2019 (1); Jersey City 2019 (3); Boulder 2025 (1) 5 FBI/Media
2025 fatal attacks Capital Jewish Museum (2 killed); Boulder (1 killed, 15 injured) 5 FBI/SCN
Physical assault rate 150 assaults (2024) – 220% increase from 2023 15 ADL
Weapons accessibility 393M+ civilian firearms; 2nd Amendment protection 5 ATF/CDC

4.2 Incident Volume & Trends (35%)

10/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Total incidents (most recent year) 9,354 (2024) – RECORD HIGH; 25+ per day 5 ADL
Year-over-year trend +59% (2023-24); +893% over 10 years 5 ADL
Post-Oct 7 surge +360% in weeks following Oct 7, 2023 10 ADL
Campus incidents 1,694 (+84% YoY); 34% hiding Jewish identity 10 ADL/Hillel
Israel-motivation factor 58% linked to Israel/Zionism – first time majority 15 ADL

4.3 Terror & Extremist Threats (25%)

18/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Active terror threats (Islamist) ISIS-inspired plots; Hamas calls; elevated since Oct 7 15 FBI/NCTC
White supremacist threat Active networks; Pittsburgh-style threat ongoing 15 FBI/DHS
Online radicalization Active recruitment; encrypted channels 20 ADL/SPLC
Foiled plots (recent) Multiple arrests 2024-25; NYC, Texas, others 25 FBI
PILLAR 4 CALCULATION: (8Γ—0.40) + (10Γ—0.35) + (18Γ—0.25) = 12/100

PILLAR 5: Movement Ecosystem (15%) NOW SCORED

32/100

5.1 Islamist Movement Presence (40%)

35/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Hizb ut-Tahrir activity Legal; active chapters; "Global Intifada" events 20 HuT/Media
Muslim Brotherhood networks Affiliated organizations; CAIR, MAS connections 35 Research
Pro-Hamas activity Widespread post-Oct 7; "Glory to the Martyrs" 25 ADL/Media
Caliphate advocacy groups HuT legal; speakers at universities 30 HuT Events

5.2 Radical Activist Networks (35%)

28/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Students for Justice in Palestine 200+ chapters; encampment organizers; some terrorism ties 20 NGO Monitor
Jewish Voice for Peace (anti-Zionist) Active nationally; occupations; some extremist ties 35 Research
Within Our Lifetime/radical groups "Globalize the Intifada"; NYC-based; violence rhetoric 15 ADL
Encampment activity 40+ university encampments Spring 2024; violence incidents 25 University/Media

5.3 Far-Right/Extremist Movements (25%)

35/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
White supremacist organizations Active nationally; propaganda distribution up 12% 25 ADL/SPLC
Neo-Nazi activity NSM, Patriot Front, others; demonstrations 30 SPLC
Conspiracy theory mainstreaming QAnon, "Great Replacement" – elevated reach 40 Research
Online extremist communities Telegram, 4chan, encrypted – active recruitment 30 ISD/ADL
PILLAR 5 CALCULATION: (35Γ—0.40) + (28Γ—0.35) + (35Γ—0.25) = 32/100

PILLAR 6: Cultural & Societal Climate (15%) NEW PILLAR

55/100

6.1 Political Discourse & Leadership (40%)

55/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Official condemnation of antisemitism Presidential statements; bipartisan; some delayed response 70 White House
Political figure statements Some problematic; MTG/Omar controversies 45 Congressional
Media coverage quality Mixed; some normalization of antisemitic tropes 50 Media Analysis
Academic discourse climate Problematic; Congress hearings; president resignations 40 Congress/Media

6.2 BDS & Boycott Activity (30%)

50/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Government anti-BDS measures 38 states with anti-boycott laws 80 State Laws
Campus BDS resolutions Multiple passed; divest pressure increasing 35 Universities
Corporate boycott campaigns Active targeting; some business impact 40 ADL/Media
Local government BDS Some municipal resolutions; limited impact 55 Local Gov

6.3 Cultural Recognition & Integration (30%)

60/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
Official heritage recognition Jewish American Heritage Month (May); White House Hanukkah 85 Federal
Holocaust education mandate 24 states require; no federal mandate 55 State Laws
Museum & memorial support USHMM federal funding; state/local memorials 75 Federal
Interfaith relations Generally positive; some strain post-Oct 7 50 Community
PILLAR 6 CALCULATION: (55Γ—0.40) + (50Γ—0.30) + (60Γ—0.30) = 55/100

PILLAR 7: Lived Experience & Community Voice (22%)

32/100

7.1 Fear & Behavior Modification (40%)

25/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
% hiding Jewish identity 34% hiding always/sometimes; 52% among young adults 20 ADL 2024-25
% avoiding Jewish events/locations 45% avoiding; 63% campus students avoid 20 ADL/Hillel
% fear for physical safety 68% somewhat/very concerned about safety 25 AJC/ADL
% considering emigration 27% have considered leaving US due to antisemitism 30 ADL Survey

7.2 Personal Experience of Antisemitism (35%)

40/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
% experienced antisemitism (12 mo) 55% experienced at least one incident 40 ADL 2024-25
% physically harassed/attacked 18% physical; 26% verbal harassment 45 Community Surveys
% experienced exclusion/minimization 44% experienced 35 ADL 2024-25

7.3 Community Vitality & Protective Factors (25%)

58/100
Indicator Measurement Score Source
General public favorability toward Jews 19% antisemitic (ADL Global 100) – moderate 80 ADL Global 100
Political representation & access Strong – Congress, Cabinet, state officials 85 Government
Jewish school enrollment trend Stable with security concerns 55 Education
Interfaith solidarity demonstrated Some strain post-Oct 7; mixed 50 Community Reports
PILLAR 7 CALCULATION: (25Γ—0.40) + (40Γ—0.35) + (58Γ—0.25) = 32/100

Key Findings

βœ“ CRITICAL STRENGTHS

βœ— CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES

Final Score Calculation

JCSI v1.2 FORMULA

JCSI = (P1Γ—0.10) + (P2Γ—0.10) + (P3Γ—0.10) + (P4Γ—0.18) + (P5Γ—0.15) + (P6Γ—0.15) + (P7Γ—0.22)

JCSI = (52Γ—0.10) + (74Γ—0.10) + (55Γ—0.10) + (12Γ—0.18) + (32Γ—0.15) + (55Γ—0.15) + (32Γ—0.22)

JCSI = 5.2 + 7.4 + 5.5 + 2.16 + 4.8 + 8.25 + 7.04 = 39/100
Score Range Classification United States
80-100 HIGH SAFETY
60-79 MODERATE SAFETY
40-59 CONCERNING
0-39 CRITICAL ← USA (39)

v1.0 vs v1.2 Score Comparison

Component v1.0 v1.2 Change
P1: Legal Framework 55 (15%) 52 (10%) ↓3 (new Envoy section)
P2: Security 72 (15%) 74 (10%) ↑2 (record funding)
P3: Criminal Justice 55 (15%) 55 (10%) β€” unchanged
P4: Threat Environment 18 (25%) 12 (18%) ↓6 (2025 attacks)
P5: Movement Ecosystem N/A (context) 32 (15%) NOW SCORED
P6: Cultural Climate N/A 55 (15%) NEW PILLAR
P7: Lived Experience 42 (20%) 32 (22%) ↓10 (ADL survey data)
OVERALL JCSI 44 39 ↓5 points (now CRITICAL)

USA vs Peer Nation Comparison (v1.2)

Country P1 Legal P4 Threat Gun Control Overall
USA 52 12 12/100 39 (CRITICAL)
Australia 72 16 94/100 44 (CONCERNING)
UK 75 28 95/100 ~52 (est.)
Germany 82 22 90/100 ~48 (est.)

Key Differentiator: The USA's constitutional gun accessibility (12/100) creates a fundamentally different risk profile. While other nations can implement gun control post-crisis (e.g., Australia 1996 NFA), the Second Amendment prevents comparable measures in the USA, making mass casualty attacks significantly more likely.